Comparative effectiveness of acoustic devicesfor monitoring bat species: a case study ofPlecotus macrobullaris in Thomatal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71911/cii-p3-nt-2025212Keywords:
bat, passive acoustic monitoring, Plecotus macrobullaris, Thomatal, ARUAbstract
The current study reports on the presence and activity of bats at the St. Georg Parish Church, Thomatal, Salzburg, Austria. This site was known in previous years to host a maternity roost of the alpine long-eared bat (Plecotus macrobullaris). Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) and traditional roost emergence counting techniques were used to document bat activity. The study compared the effectiveness of three ultrasonic detection devices: Song Meter Mini Bat, Echo Meter Touch 2 Pro, and batcorder. Following expert verification, the study confirmed the presence and seasonal emergence phenology of P. macrobullaris and documented additional bat species including Eptesicus nilssonii and Myotis daubentonii. The results highlighted variations in the accuracy and species detection capabilities of the devices. While differences in device performance were clear, the findings emphasize the applicability of PAM for monitoring bat populations. Findings underscore the importance of proper device handling and appropriate data analytical techniques to ensure reliable species identification.
References
J. Shonfield and E. M. Bayne, “Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: Current use and future applications,” Avian Conserv. Ecol., vol. 12, no. 1, 2017. doi: 10.5751/ACE-00974-120114
K. R. Goodwin and E. H. Gillam, “Testing accuracy and agreement among multiple versions of automated bat call classification software,” Wildl. Soc. Bull., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 690–705, 2021. doi: 10.1002/wsb.1235
R. Gibb, E. Browning, P. Glover-Kapfer, and K. E. Jones, “Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring,” Methods Ecol. Evol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 169–185, 2019. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13101
M. E. Gleason, V. M. Eddington, and L. N. Kloepper, “Acoustic behavior in the northern short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda): Ultrasonic click production in a novel environment,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 411–417, 2023. doi: 10.1121/10.0020071
L. S. M. Sugai, T. S. F. Silva, J. W. Ribeiro, and D. Llusia, “Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: Review and perspectives,” BioScience, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2019. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biy147
F. Spitzenberger, P. Strelkov, and E. Haring, “Morphology and mitochondrial DNA sequences show that Plecotus alpinus Kiefer & Veith, 2002 and Plecotus microdontus Spitzenberger, 2002 are synonyms of Plecotus macrobullaris Kuzjakin, 1965,” Natura Croatica, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 39–53, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/11440
H. J. Temple and A. Terry, The Status and Distribution of European Mammals. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007. Accessed: Mar. 6, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/RL-4-013.pdf
T. Bohnenstengel et al., Liste rouge chauves-souris: Espèces menacées en Suisse, état 2011. Berne, Switzerland: OFEV; Centre Suisse de Cartographie de la Faune; Centres suisses de coordination pour l’étude et la protection des chauves-souris; Institut fédéral de recherches sur la forêt, la neige et le paysage, 2014. Accessed: Mar. 6, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/fr/home/themes/biodiversite/publications/publications-biodiversite/liste-rouge-chauves-souris.html
A. Alberdi and O. Aizpurua, “Plecotus macrobullaris (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae),” Mamm. Species, vol. 50, no. 958, pp. 26–33, 2018. doi: 10.1093/mspecies/sey003
A. Alberdi, O. Aizpurua, J. Aihartza, and I. Garin, “Unveiling the factors shaping the distribution of widely distributed alpine vertebrates, using multi-scale ecological niche modelling of the bat Plecotus macrobullaris,” Front. Zool., vol. 11, no. 1, 2014. doi: 10.1186/s12983-014-0077-6
S. Dietrich, D. P. Szameitat, A. Kiefer, H.-U. Schnitzler, and A. Denzinger, “Echolocation signals of the plecotine bat, Plecotus macrobullaris Kuzyakin, 1965,” Acta Chiropterologica, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 465–475, 2006. doi: 10.3161/1733-5329(2006)8[465:ESOTPB]2.0.CO;2
A. Kiefer and M. Veith, “A new species of long-eared bat from Europe (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae),” Myotis, vol. 39, pp. 5–16, 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.ftp.funet.fi/index/files/index/Tree_of_life/mammalia/chiroptera/vespertilionidae/plecotus/Artbeschreibung-alpinus.pdf
T. Andriollo and M. Ruedi, “Novel molecular tools to identify Plecotus bats in sympatry and a review of their distribution in Switzerland,” Rev. Suisse Zool., vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2018. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1196013
C. Dietz, O. von Helversen, and D. Nill, Handbuch der Fledermäuse Europas und Nordwestafrikas: Biologie, Kennzeichen, Gefährdung. Stuttgart, Germany: Kosmos Verlag, 2007.
RSIS, “Mires of the Schwarzenberg.” [Online]. Available: https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1369
. Accessed: Aug. 31, 2023.
E. Stüber, R. Lindner, and M. Jerabek, Die Säugetiere Salzburgs. Salzburg, Austria: Haus der Natur – Museum für Natur und Technik, 2014.
J. Battersby, Guidelines for Surveillance and Monitoring of European Bats. Bonn, Germany: UNEP/EUROBATS, 2010.
G. Reiter, U. Hüttmeir, and M. Jerabek, Erhebungsbogen für Ausflugszählung. Koordinationsstelle für Fledermausschutz und -forschung in Österreich, 2019.
L. Millon, J.-F. Julien, R. Julliard, and C. Kerbiriou, “Bat activity in intensively farmed landscapes with wind turbines and offset measures,” Ecol. Eng., vol. 75, pp. 250–257, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.050
Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Bestimmung von Fledermausrufaufnahmen und Kriterien für die Wertung von akustischen Artnachweisen: Teil 1 – Gattungen Nyctalus, Eptesicus, Vespertilio, Pipistrellus (nyctaloide und pipistrelloide Arten), Mopsfledermaus, Langohrfledermäuse und Hufeisennasen. Augsburg, Germany, 2020.
Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Bestimmung von Fledermausrufaufnahmen und Kriterien für die Wertung von akustischen Artnachweisen: Teil 2 – Gattung Myotis. Augsburg, Germany, 2022.
G. Pfalzer, Inter- und intraspezifische Variabilität der Soziallaute heimischer Fledermäuse (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Berlin, Germany: Mensch-und-Buch-Verlag, 2002.
R. Skiba, Europäische Fledermäuse. Die neue Brehm-Bücherei. Hohenwarsleben, Germany: Westarp Wissenschaften, 2009.
J. Gebhard and K. Hirschi, “Analyse des Kotes aus einer Wochenstube von Myotis myotis (Borkh., 1797) bei Zwingen (Kanton Bern, Schweiz),” Mitt. Naturforsch. Ges. Bern, vol. 42, pp. 145–155, 1985.
C. Flaquer, I. Torre, and A. Arrizabalaga, “Comparison of sampling methods for inventory of bat communities,” J. Mammal., vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 526–533, 2007. doi: 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-135R1.1
R. Brabant, Y. Laurent, U. Dolap, S. Degraer, and B. J. Poerink, “Comparing the results of four widely used automated bat identification software programs to identify nine bat species in coastal Western Europe,” Belg. J. Zool., vol. 148, no. 2, 2018. doi: 10.26496/bjz.2018.21
N. D. Beauregard, T. C. Theimer, S. J. Sferra, and B. Pasch, “Using autonomous recording units to identify and monitor western yellow-billed cuckoo habitat,” Wildl. Soc. Bull., vol. 48, no. 3, 2024. doi: 10.1002/wsb.1546
S. E. Newson, Y. Bas, A. Murray, and S. Gillings, “Potential for coupling the monitoring of bush-crickets with established large-scale acoustic monitoring of bats,” Methods Ecol. Evol., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1051–1062, 2017. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12720
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Carinthia II / Part 3 - Carinthia Nature Tech
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
